Economy is for Winners (Budget Part 3)

After public safety, economic development is the backbone and engine for growth in any city. Sacramento continues to sit in the shadow of such Bay Area greats as San Francisco and the entire Silicon Valley. One might suppose that the Council is interested in economic improvements city-wide with all of the investment in sports infrastructure, but that couldn't be farther from the truth.
Sacramento still relies heavily on government employees for its economic health. And jobs that aren't related to government are heavily biased toward low-wage and part-time work. Indeed, even jobs created by sporting entertainment will be among those two categories. Does the budget support economic development for full-time highly skilled employment?

If the Council's investment in economic development planning is any indication, no. The City will completely divest itself from economic planning, and instead give a mere $188,000 to Greater Sacramento - an organization of citizens and businesses who want to see the City's economy improve. We could probably all agree that any organization of leaders that aren't our City Council can do a better job of planning for Sacramento’s future - but then why are Council Members getting $790,000 more next year? Shouldn't this money be going to those that are actually doing the work to pull Sacramento out of the debt that the Council got into?

And even if you think that businesses should fund their own economic development, what about the city's 'rainy day fund'? Shouldn't Sacramento leaders be planning for the next economic downturn so we don't have to cut our police and fire by another 25%, or raise taxes on already struggling families? No, not in this budget. The proposed budget notes "recommendations for funding the [Economic Uncertainty Reserve] will be considered as funding is identified."

Basically, Council has no self-control when it comes to spending our money. Even though they have themselves identified a goal of 10% reserve, and they are still $1.5 million short of that goal, there are no plans to save for our future.
One might also hope that the City intends to directly help small businesses establish a presence in Sacramento, large businesses hire skilled workers (which we have many of that commute to the Bay or foothills), or new economic opportunities that want to establish a presence here. Instead of simple and important measures such as tax relief, permitting streamlining, and start-up incentives that are being used by neighboring communities, the Sacramento Council will spend its time and resources contemplating a better business climate.
The budget prioritizes finding "access to" foreign investments (but no assistance), pursuit of grant dollars for infrastructure (none of which have been secured), and enhancements to the city's website (yay, can we have emoji please?). Oh, and they save the best for last. The Council wants to "engage with the Greater Sacramento Area Economic Council" and "strengthen relationships with regional partners" - because this is a new concept and they haven't been doing their job over the last year.

How does that $25,000 raise for each City Council Member sound now?



Public Safety - Not a Priority (Budget Part 2)

In the last post, we revealed that the huge taxes and fees the City is taking from you are going to fatten the budgets of your City Council Member. So, we should start examining what it is you'll be getting for the $5.6 million they are voting to pay themselves. The first responsibility of government is to protect the people - Public Safety is paramount.

But a review of the City's proposed budget shows that improvements to public safety are hardly a concern for the Council.

The proposed budget notes a desire to increase police staffing levels to two officers per 1,000 residents, but that such an increase would "require substantial new ongoing resources" which are not provided for in this budget. The Council is proposing to move away from a community policing model to a "geographic policing model". To hell with communities - they cost too much to provide adequate police resources anyway!
Oh, but the lack of officers is okay. The City will just purchase another ten cameras to install around Sacramento to record all of our movements and keep them in police files. It won't matter much the crimes that are happening in our neighborhoods, because police will be able to watch their televisions and find criminals after-the-fact. Your house may be trashed, your car smashed, or your neighbor murdered - but at least they can (maybe) figure out who did it!

The City Council is giving themselves each a 6% raise, so we should assume that the Police Department will also have at least as much , right? No, of course not. The proposed budget shows only one-half of one percent (0.5%) increase for the Police.

And the best is yet to come - other than body cameras and other recording devices, the City Council is putting police funding into hiring new staff at the Police Department. This should come as good news for those of us watching invasive property and non-violent crimes devour our communities. But none of these proposed staff will actually be helping to deter or combat crime.
Out of newly created positions, about 2.5 will go to running background checks on city employees. And the other 22.5 positions will be part-time jobs for police recruiters to go out and talk to kids about becoming police officers. Never mind the fact that even if they want to become officers there's no new money in the budget to hire them.

That's right. The Council's answer to crime in Sacramento is to hire part-time recruiters and buy cameras. But they really deserve that 6% raise, right?



City Council Gives Themselves 6% Raise (Budget Part 1)

Last week Sacramento's proposed 2015-16 budget was released for public comment. The contents of that budget tell an interesting story about the priorities of the City Council - A story that doesn't support the rhetoric coming from our elected officials.

City of Sacramento Seal


The proposed budget "reflects adopted Council priorities" and amounts to almost $1 billion - that's almost $2,000 for every man, woman and child in Sacramento. Think for a moment ... what could you do for your family, and what kind of amazing vacation could you take, if you had $2,000 extra for each person in your family?  But I digress.

So what exactly is the City proposing to do with all of that money taken from you in taxes and fees? Well, to start with, each Council Member will increase their own budget by 6%, or about $25,000 over last year's approved amount. That's right, you're paying more in Measure U taxes so that they can fatten their own budgets. Between the Mayor and City Council, there is a proposed increase of over $790,000 from the last approved budget.

Money From The Sky

When was the last time you got a 6% raise at work? And what exactly are the City Council doing to deserve such a pay increase? That is what the rest of this series intends to answer.


×